By: Brad Walker, MMATorch Contributor

MMATorch contributor Brad Walker had the opportunity to speak with UFC Heavyweight Cheick Kongo this week via email ahead of the French striker’s bout with Mark Hunt in Japan next month. Here is their conversation:

BRAD WALKER: First of all Cheick let me thank you for taking the time to sit down and talk to me and MMATorch!

CHEICK KONGO: It’s a pleasure, you’re welcome, anytime Brad!

WALKER: What was it like to first step in the Octagon and win back at UFC 61?

KONGO: It was amazing; first fight in UFC in Las Vegas, first big win over Gilbert Aldana (May he rest in peace), I couldn’t expect better!

WALKER: You’ve had some incredible moments inside the octagon, what is your personal favorite?

KONGO: My favorite moment is against Mirko Cro Cop at UFC 75 when the referee raises my hand up; I take a great deal of personal gratification from that fight.

WALKER: In the UFC you have lost twice by split decision, once to Carmelo Marreo and once to Heath Herring, do you feel the decisions should have gone your way?

Not for Marrero, but I believe that my loss by split decision against Herring is pure robbery. 

WALKER: Recently in a column I said your stock in the division is rising, where do you see yourself going in 2012?

KONGO: I see myself on top of the division I wanna fight for the title. 2012 is a big year for me.

WALKER: In your fight with Pat Barry you had the most unlikely and incredible knockout in years, how much of that do you remember?

KONGO: Thank You. Sometimes things go like this. You never know what could happen during a fight. I remember everything, but for me, there’s nothing to be exciting about; I was very dedicated to my goal, I knew I had to win by all means necessary. This is what I’ve done there and now i am working on the next step.

WALKER: You’ve managed a solid 10 wins in the UFC, where do you rank yourself currently in the heavyweight division?

KONGO: Top 5. Next question. (laughs)

WALKER: You held numerous titles in kick boxing, do you believe thats your cornerstone in MMA?

KONGO: Not too much in kick boxing, but mainly in Muay Thai Boxing. Most people would define me as a striker, that’s true, but I have also developed all aspects of a complete MMA athlete’s game.

WALKER: What do you think of Alistair Overeem?

KONGO: He’s a very good fighter. I am just a little bit disappointed by the fact that he could fight so quickly for the HW UFC Title while it took Cain Velasquez six wins in a row to fight the Champion (Brock at this time). This is not fair.

WALKER: If you could rematch one of your last two losses, Frank Mir or Cain Velasquez, who would you pick and why?

KONGO: Mir, definitely. I was in a good shape, I had a good game plan but Mir is a smart fighter, I was caught by surprise and I lost too fast. I couldn’t express myself at all.

WALKER: Whats been the hardest test for you in MMA?

KONGO: All the fights are tough, each of them was a test. I think that the worst things are not the fights themselves but the training camps. You need to adapt yourself, stay focused, constantly improve your skills, be strong mentally and physically. Hard work, determination & dedication.

WALKER: You’re now training at Wolfslair with guys like Rampage and Bisping who are notoriously colorful personalities, does it bring out a new side of you?

KONGO: No, but having partners like Bisping and Rampage is a real pleasure. I mean, their outgoing nature is really appreciated when you are so seriously busy with your training. I like their personalities. They’re not only partners for me, they are family.

WALKER: Last but not least, pick any one fighter past or present in MMA to have a dream fight with, who do you pick and why?

KONGO: Chuck Norris! I would love to replay the scene as in “The Dragon’s Fire” when Bruce Lee pulls out his hairs! (No offense intended, i am a big fan of… Bruce Lee)

WALKER: Thanks for your time Cheick, and best of luck in the future!

KONGO: Many thanks to you, Brad, to MMATorch and all my fans there, to the UFC, my team Wolfslair, My sponsors MMAElite, FordHB, Pull In, Whereamfrom & MusclePharm, my family and friends who support me from day one . Don’t forget to watch UFC 144 – Japan!

Source: http://www.mmatorch.com/artman2/publish/Interviews_34/article_12264.shtml

Dave Gomez Keith Hackney Matt Hamill Volk Han

Source: http://essentialelvis.blogspot.com/2010/11/no-phonecalls-today.html

King Creole GI Blues Flaming Star Wild In The Country

Caterham chief technical officer Mike Gascoyne says the team stand to benefit from the ban on exhaust-blown diffusers in 2012.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/f1fanatic/~3/s2zDAx–n7U/

John Cannon Eitel Cantoni Bill Cantrell Ivan Capelli

When the 2012 FIM X-Trial World Championship rolls into Marseille for tomorrow’s third round two-day…

Source: http://www.fim-live.com/en/media/news/news-detail/article/1327569205-marseille-ten-plus-one/

Willy Bauer Jean Michel Bayle Pit Beirer Christian Beggi

MTV Buzzworthy Blog: Funniest Celebrity Twitter Photos!

Related Artists

• 50 Cent
• Britney Spears
• DJ Pauly D
• 30 Seconds To Mars
• Jonas Brothers

Source: http://www.mtv.com/photos/mtv-buzzworthy-blog-funniest-celebrity-twitter-photos/1672342/6607579/photo.jhtml

Brittany Daniel Brittany Lee Brittany Murphy Brittany Snow

As we already know, the KTM Freeride E will be out in 2012 in limited numbers, as the Austrian brand tests the waters on the electric dirt bike market. Building an electric not because they believe in the technology’s immediate relevancy, but because they believe in its future and want to continue being a market leader, KTM is the first big motorcycle OEM to bring an electric motorcycle to market. Giving Zero Motorcycles (and soon …

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AsphaltandRubber/~3/9IbVhunndIA/

Adrian Bosshard Christian Boudinot Roy Boughey  Dennis Boulom

Jon Rubinstein leaves Hewlett-Packard originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:56:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink All Things D  |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/cR9VUx9M7s4/

SI INTERNATIONAL SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY SCIENTIFIC GAMES SANDISK

Fight Network previews Strikforce’s heavyweight Grand Prix featuring Alistair Overeem vs. Fabricio Werdum and Josh Barnett vs. Brett Rogers taking place on June 18, 2011 in Dallas, Texas.

Source: http://mmalice.com/strikeforce/strikeforce-overeem-vs-werdum-countdown-preview-show-video_927471d83.html

Ryan Gracie Peter Graham Forrest Griffin Tyson Griffin

Source: http://www.elvistodayblog.com/2012/01/blood-harmony.html

FAIRYTALE FAME AND FORTUNE FARTHER ALONG FEVER

Sebastian Vettel’s second world championship title was as remarkable for its control as much as the blinding speed of the German and his Red Bull.

Vettel based his season on a strategy of taking pole position, blitzing the first two laps and from then on going only as fast as he needed to.

The plan generally worked to perfection – Vettel took 11 wins and 15 poles from 19 grands prix – but it left you wondering just how fast he and the Red Bull could have gone.

In Brazil, I asked him if, with the title already in the bag, he had ever been tempted to just go for it, to really push the car and himself to the absolute limits. He replied that he had done just that in Korea and India, the scenes of two of his most dominant wins. “We were able to explore and sometimes take a little bit more risk,” Vettel told me.

Despite Vettel’s domination in 2011, there were very few of the runaway wins normally seen when one car is superior to the rest. Quite often, the races looked competitive, with Vettel tantalisingly close to – but frustratingly just out of reach of – his leading rivals.

Vettel and team boss Christian Horner often insisted the Red Bull had less of an advantage over McLaren and Ferrari in 2011 than in 2010. Yet Vettel won only five races and recorded 10 poles in 2010 on his way to winning the championship for the first time.

Let’s examine the two seasons in a little more detail.

In 2010, Vettel’s advantage in qualifying over team-mate Mark Webber was only 0.053 seconds when averaged out over the season. In 2011, it was 0.414. Likewise, Vettel’s average advantage over the fastest driver not in a Red Bull was 0.077secs in 2010. In 2011, it was 0.317. That is a massive percentage gain from year to year.

There are reasons why Webber was so far adrift of his team-mate. Unlike Vettel, he struggled with the new Pirelli tyres, which affected both his pace in qualifying and his tyre wear in races.

The Australian is also physically bigger than Vettel so was occasionally at a disadvantage with the car’s weight distribution, which again impacted on both his pace and tyre wear.

Turn One, race one; Vettel already has a big lead as the rest squabble. The story of 2011. Photo: Getty

The DRS overtaking aid, which gave drivers within one second of a car in front a boost in straight-line speed, also influenced matters.

But it is the tyres which were key. Asked to produce ones that spiced up racing, Pirelli came up with rubber that wore out rapidly, forcing a greater number of pit stops and resulting in more unpredictable races.

It is also worth looking at Red Bull’s race strategy in 2011. The team may have had a car whose aerodynamic superiority made it the fastest by far, but it lacked a little straight-line speed compared to the McLarens and Ferraris. On top of that, I understand Vettel thought some of his rivals were perhaps better at wheel-to-wheel racing.

As a result, Red Bull’s strategy was based on Vettel taking pole position, then opening up enough of a gap by lap three to prevent anyone from being close enough to make use of the DRS system, which couldn’t be used for the first two laps. After that, he would measure his pace to those behind, producing a super-fast lap or two if he needed to.

Such a strategy did have its risks. If Vettel found himself in the pack during a race, he would have problems overtaking as the car was set up for lap time not straight-line speed. In other words, an error in qualifying or at the start could mess up an entire race.

var emp = new bbc.Emp(); emp.setWidth(“512″); emp.setHeight(“323″); emp.setDomId(“closer_101211″); emp.setPlaylist(“http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/emp/15910000/15911600/15911657.sxml”); emp.write();

Red Bull were caught out a couple of times, notably when Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso rocketed to the front on the run down to the first corner in Spain and Italy.

In both cases, Vettel managed to get past again. In Spain, he did it by pit-stop strategy, although it took two attempts, while in Monza he achieved it a brave overtaking move around the outside of the flat-out Curva Grande.

Had it been a McLaren that passed Vettel – a car that was faster than the Ferrari over the lap and down the straights – he might have been sat behind for the entire race.

But team boss Horner was adamant the strategy that Red Bull employed was the right one. “As a team, you have to attack the events,” he said. “If you are conservative, sometimes you can pay a penalty. If Vettel was in a situation where he needed a big overtake, yes, a gamble was taken. But it was a calculated risk.”

So how dominant was the Red Bull, really?

It had a clear performance advantage in at least nine of the races, of which Vettel won eight – Australia, Turkey, Valencia, Belgium, Italy, Singapore, Korea and India. The other one was Brazil, where he hit trouble.

That leaves five races at which it was not possible to ascertain whether Vettel’s was the fastest race car, although it almost certainly was in most of them. They were Malaysia and Monaco, which he won, and China, Canada and Abu Dhabi, which he did not. And the remaining five races where it definitely was not, out of which he won only in Spain.

The first obvious conclusion is that the Red Bull’s pace advantage was restricted by the tyres. On many occasions, Vettel could have gone faster but chose not to because he was concerned about over-using the tyres.

At the same time, Red Bull insiders insist Vettel was not always in the fastest car. There were weekends, they say, when they did not think the car was quick enough yet Vettel still managed to put it on pole. Equally, there were times when Vettel was having to drive on the edge to break the DRS and to hold his advantage at the head of the field.

The Pirellis required something new of the driver – an exquisite feel for the limits of the tyres, the intelligence to drive measured races at exactly the pace the tyres and car could cope with and the consistency to do it at every race.

How many drivers could do that?

Jenson Button had a great season for McLaren, finishing second behind Vettel in the standings. The 2009 world champion treats his tyres delicately and, at his best, is as good as anyone. However, his form tends to fluctuate depending on outside circumstances, while he is not the best qualifier.

As for Hamilton, his speed and feel are at least equal to Vettel’s but the 2008 world champion struggled in 2011, making too many errors and perhaps not fully grasping the demands of the new F1.

Then there is Alonso. The double world champion boasts speed, consistency, adaptability and mental strength. However, the Ferrari was nowhere near fast enough this year and it’s rare that the Spaniard transcends the car’s abilities in qualifying, although he nearly always does in races.

That is why, in 2011, Vettel was generally in a league of his own, even on the occasions when his car was not.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andrewbenson/2011/12/sebastian_vettels_second_world.html

Andrea de Cesaris Francois Cevert Eugene Chaboud Jay Chamberlain